Who’s in Your Gang?

Image from I CAN HAS CHEEZBURGER

Image from I CAN HAS CHEEZBURGER

I had a weird brain wave crossing with Robert Scoble last week.

Basically, I’ve been trying to find value in FourSquare, the hot new web app on the block, that launched this Spring at SXSW, where any self-respecting hot web app gets its initial hotness.

If you care, FourSquare seems like it might be interesting. It’s a geo-based app with some interesting gaming aspects, which I’m very curious to explore.

Unfortunately, you’ll have a bit of a lonely expedition if you’re using it in a city without many other users, i.e. anywhere other than NYC, LA, the Bay Area. There’s an interesting meat-life tie in with FourSquare that’s developing and will be neat to watch evolve.

But again, if you don’t have a bunch of people nearby, you won’t see any value. Portland’s a pretty early adopter place, and I’ve been getting more friend invitations lately, indicating that I may soon be able to enjoy the fun of FourSquare. I thought last week about posting a missive about the short list of early adopter friends you expect to find on any legit social app/platform.

Anyway, Scoble’s post about the gang of 2,000 is pretty much what I had in mind, minus the hype piece. It reminds me of his effect on FriendFeed back in February 2008, and each time there’s a new shiny object to play with, you’ll get the same gang effect.

Every single social app/platform includes the ability to import (steal) your contacts from other existing apps, via your email accounts or other apps like Facebook, Twitter and the like. Legit services (like FourSquare) go the extra mile to implement OAuth support and Facebook Connect to let you know they’re not mining your credentials. One up for them.

This process helps spread the new app, and it also acts as a vetting process for new users, e.g. if no one I know is using the app, I’m less likely to trust it. I’m not a pro blogger or influencer, so by the time I get to a new service, it should have an early adopter I trust using it already.

Tangent time, trust always comes up when I talk about a key components for advancing the intertubes, and this is one argument I have against the Semantic Web (or Web 3.0, ack); I don’t implicitly trust smart algorithms and machines. I need to remember to add that to a thread Billy Bagpipes and I have on Connect.

Anyway, I know many of you are early adopter types, willing to kick the tires on apps to see if they’re worthwhile.

Who do you expect to see there in order to legitimize the effort, i.e. who’s in your gang?

Find the comments.

Link to the original site

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Related posts

Leave a Reply